Head to head
Lano vs Remote
Price, country coverage, owned entities, and provider model for Lano and Remote, side by side and cited.
- Verified · checked 5 d ago
2compared
170most countries
Lano (Lano EOR)·Remote (Remote EOR, Remote Contractor Management, Remote Global Payroll)
Brands
Lano EOR
Remote EOR, Remote Contractor Management, Remote Global Payroll
Provider model
Reaches 170+ countries through a vetted local-partner network (no owned entities).
Wholly-owned entities in 90+ countries (contractor pay in 180+), with strong IP and equity handling.
Availability
Released
2018
2019
Highlighted figures mark the lower fee, wider country coverage and wider owned-entity country coverage. Confirm availability, the local employment model and a country-specific quote before choosing.
Published fees
How the starting fees compare
Lower starting feeLano
Lano has the lowest published starting fee in this comparison at €499 /mo, $130 less per employee per month than Remote. These are published starting fees, not equivalent country-specific quotes. Confirm each provider's availability, local employment model, included services and total cost for your hire.
From From €499 /moThe bottom line
What actually differs
- Lano has the lower price (€499 /mo).
- Lano covers the most countries (170).
- Remote has the most owned entities (90).
Go deeper
Open the full record
BestEOR.co is an independent informational comparison site, not an employer of record, a payroll provider, or a legal or tax advisor. Pricing, coverage, and features are curated from public sources and can change or be incomplete, and much EOR pricing is quoted on request rather than published. Country coverage does not guarantee a provider can employ in every location or role. Always confirm the current price, coverage, and terms directly with the provider, and take your own legal and tax advice, before signing.